Monday, August 24, 2009
Justice and misplaced blame
Sunday, August 23, 2009
I call your bluff, Democrats
Friday, August 21, 2009
Boiling it down..
The Death Panels are real, despite the stupid name..
Ezekiel Emanuel, Rahm Emanuel’s brother and one of Obama’s health-care advisors, wrote in a January 2009 white paper that health care should be rationed in a way that “promot[es] and reward[s] social usefulness.” He said age could play a factor in determining who can and cannot access health-care resources.
Emanuel also wrote, “[S]ervices provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens [in the body politic] are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”
Obama addressed this too, saying, “Whether, sort of in the aggregate, society making those decisions to give my grandmother, or everybody else’s aging grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when they’re terminally ill is a sustainable model, is a very difficult question. … And that’s part of why you have to have some independent group that can give you guidance.”
We will spend money we don’t have to pay for health care, or we will prioritize who gets treatment. It is an inevitable fact of life that the more the government outlays to keep you alive, the more your life becomes subject to a cost/benefit analysis.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
The heart of the debate isnt Health Care..
The government wants to continue down this road by telling you what car you can drive, because if we dont drive a tiny car powered by laptop batteries, the polar caps will melt and the world will end. They do this in a variety of ways, first by demonizing the people who drive anything larger than a Malibu. Second, they refuse to allow oil drilling in the most lucrative and oil-rich area of the country, the Alaskan ANWR. This means we must further depend on middle east oil, which considering the volatile nature of the region, means that at some point the supply could be compromised. And lets not forget Cash For Clunkers, the plan to get all those evil vehicles off the road. 425 auto dealers in New York are pulling out of the program because they have NOT BEEN PAID for the cars they have destroyed in the name of this program. How in the world can anyone believe that this entity can efficiently run anything?
President Obama has stated publicly that he wants to put the coal industry out of business. How many people work in the coal industry? For that matter, since he took office, what has the unemployment rate done but go up? I honestly think this is what the Liberal establishment wants. Yes, they WANT high unemployment. If you are out of work, and jobs are tough to come by, along comes Uncle Sugar with a great new FREE health insurance plan. If enough people are out of work, this will be a great incentive for them to be okay with a government takeover of the Health care industry. Thankfully many people are not buying the idea, unemployed or not. But the roots go far deeper. Our country is on an out of control spending spree the likes of which it has never seen. Without public outcry, the leaders of this deficit ballooning crew would have already purchased the $500 billion in private planes they wanted all on the earning ability of people who wont be born for 20 years!
I have rambled on enough about this i am sure, so i will just close with this. No matter what "report" comes out that says that our health care is like #37 in the world or some horse-hockey like that, one fact is clear and undeniable. People from every country in the world come to the USA when they need the best cardio/neuro care, and I have yet to hear of americans journeying to Paris or Rome or Toronto when they need a procedure done. Think about it, everyone in the world knows that the best health care is in the USA.....except the people in the USA.
Message for Democrats hoping to win an election...
- Stop spending money that we don’t have.
- Stop using the courts to steal wins you can’t get at the voting booth.
- Stop pretending that you can make us all rich by making some of us poorer.
- Stop ignoring foreign affairs.
- Stop acting like you’re above us all.
And, finally:
- Stop calling us ‘un-American’ and ‘traitors’ when we disagree with you.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
What Government Health Care will be like:
Thousands of surgeries may be cut in Metro Vancouver due to government underfunding, leaked paper
VANCOUVER — Vancouver patients needing neurosurgery, treatment for vascular diseases and other medically necessary procedures can expect to wait longer for care, NDP health critic Adrian Dix said Monday.
Dix said a Vancouver Coastal Health Authority document shows it is considering chopping more than 6,000 surgeries in an effort to make up for a dramatic budgetary shortfall that could reach $200 million.
“This hasn’t been announced by the health authority … but these cuts are coming,” Dix said, citing figures gleaned from a leaked executive summary of “proposed VCH surgical reductions.”
The health authority confirmed the document is genuine, but said it represents ideas only.
“It is a planning document. It has not been approved or implemented,” said spokeswoman Anna Marie D’Angelo.
Dr. Brian Brodie, president of the BC Medical Association, called the proposed surgical cuts “a nightmare.”
“Why would you begin your cost-cutting measures on medically necessary surgery? I just can’t think of a worse place,” Brodie said.
According to the leaked document, Vancouver Coastal — which oversees the budget for Vancouver General and St. Paul’s hospitals, among other health-care facilities — is looking to close nearly a quarter of its operating rooms starting in September and to cut 6,250 surgeries, including 24 per cent of cases scheduled from September to March and 10 per cent of all medically necessary elective procedures this fiscal year.
The plan proposes cutbacks to neurosurgery, ophthalmology, vascular surgery, and 11 other specialized areas.
As many of 112 full-time jobs — including 13 anesthesiologist positions — would be affected by the reductions, the document says.
“Clearly this will impact the capacity of the health-care system to provide care, not just now but in the future,” Dix said.
Further reductions in surgeries are scheduled during the Olympics, when the health authority plans to close approximately a third of its operating rooms.
Two weeks ago, Dix released a Fraser Health Authority draft communications plan listing proposed clinical care cuts, including a 10-per-cent cut in elective surgeries and longer waits for MRI scans.
The move comes after the province acknowledged all health authorities together will be forced to cut staff, limit some services and increase fees to find $360 million in savings during the current fiscal year.
In all, Fraser Health is looking at a $160-million funding shortfall.
D’Angelo said Vancouver Coastal’s deficit is closer to $90 million — almost a third of which ($23 million) has already been absorbed through reductions in non-clinical administration efficiencies.
Vancouver Coastal performed 67,000 surgeries last year, an increase of 6,500 surgeries over 2007.
“What has now happened is that now our wait times are about 25 per cent lower than the provincial average,” D’Angelo said. “We have put a dent in that wait list.”
Brodie acknowledged surgical waiting times have dropped significantly in recent years, particularly for patients needing hip and joint replacements.
He said the proposed cuts threaten those advancements.
“It sounds like we are going backwards here,” he said.
Total health spending in British Columbia was $15.7 billion this year, up about four per cent over last year’s total of 15.1 billion, according to figures provided by the ministry of health.
Health Minister Kevin Falcon was unavailable for comment Monday on the proposed health-care cuts. A ministry spokesman said Falcon is away on his honeymoon until the end of August.
Elsewhere in British Columbia, the province will look to replace the head of the Interior Health Authority, Murray Ramsden, after he announced he will step down at the end of the year.
Ramsden has said his decision to retire is not related to financial problems faced by the authority.
Hump day crapfest
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Co-ops are Public Option by another name
The following is from www.redstate.com:
"You are going to hear a lot of talk in the coming weeks about co-ops. The Obama administration is signaling that the “public option” may not be needed in the healthcare plan.
They are retreating to “co-ops”. Friends, a cooperative healthcare device is the public option just with a better poll tested name.
Francis noted this morning that “co-ops … will be functionally indistinguishable from a public option because they will similarly benefit from free capital, grabbed from the taxpayers.” In other words, the referee will begin playing the game and, like with the public option, co-ops will kill off private insurance.
The White House says this is to introduce competition into the market. Here’s a big rule in life, though: government cannot compete with private business when government is also writing the rules.
As Francis noted:
These people aren’t proposing to introduce competition at all. They’re proposing to introduce supply. (If Obama, Pelosi and Waxman actually reasoned that too much supply makes prices fall, they can each have a gold star.)
But the market isn’t adding new supply today, because none is needed. Indeed, if it were legal to produce new lower-cost products without some of the features mandated by current laws, the market would produce that supply overnight.
Do not believe that the public option is going away. Do not believe that the Democrats are going to give up on universal healthcare. They are not. They are going to change the language and keep the same goal and plan. It may take them longer, but they will continue pushing forward.
Now we are at the hour of danger. Republicans, wanting to appear reasonable, might cut a deal and go with co-ops. If they do, they are voting for a government take over of healthcare.
Keep the pressure up."
Medicare and Medicaid are for all intensive purposes broke. The federal lending institutions of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are in shambles, even the vaunted "cash for clunkers" program was underfunded and is now becoming detrimental to charity organizations that depend on vehicle donations. In my, Jim Mansell's, humble opinion, i do not believe that many of the regular people who want health care reform want it for nefarious reasons. These are good people who just have either had difficult experiences with health insurance companies or just want everyone taken care of because they have a heart of gold. That is a given. There are a few average citizens of the USA that want something for nothing, free health care, because they think that they wont have to pay for it. This is insanity, because there is never anything that doesnt come with a cost in one way or another. Canada right now is having major issues with its system, and the latest news is that people in Canada want it changed because it is not working the way it should. In France, they have a Universal Health care, but it is supplemented by private insurances, and even with all that, peoples cost per capita arent any less than what we pay. The U.K. has a system that looks sound on the outside, but if you are beyond a certain age, or income level, you do not get cortizone shots for pain because it is just not "cost effective".
Bottom line for me is this. Neither the previous administrations, nor this one, have shown ME any reason why they should be entrusted with such a complex mechanism as the health care of such a large nation as this. To me, it looks like nothing more than putting control in the hands of people who cannot even keep their own states from going into the red ink. As Margaret Thatcher put it quite succinctly, "Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money". It also stifles the desire for quality of service and care, and reduces the incentive for improvement.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Monday in the heartland
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Some important things my friend Julie-Ann found..
out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another
person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to
anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody
else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work
because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other
half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is
going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of
the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
Adrian Rogers, 1931